Canada Values Health

Preventing medication errors — Can we afford not to make prescribing safer? 2009-02-18 15:34:40

Preventing medication errors — Can we afford not to make prescribing safer?

Prescription drugs are now the second largest cost, after hospitals, in our health care system. In 2008, we spent $30 billion on prescriptions.

Is that the right amount to spend on drugs? Too much? Too little? How can we know?

What if you consider that problems with medication are a major cause of emergency room visits and hospital admissions, even death? Just among seniors, these problems are estimated to cost Canadian health care $11 billion a year.

Meanwhile, many Canadians cannot afford to fill their prescriptions.

How can we ensure that Canadians get the medications they need as safely, efficiently and cost-effectively as possible?

BC’s PharmaNet system offers one model for promoting the cost-effective use of drugs. Implemented in 1997, the system captures every prescription filled in the province in a central set of linked databases that combine patient data with information about drug safety. The system alerts the pharmacist to potential errors, drug interactions and/or allergies that a patient has, helping to prevent medication problems before people go home with their pills.

Emergency department teams in BC can use PharmaNet to get a drug history for incoming patients unable to give their own medical history. The same drug history provides instant clues about a patient’s pre-existing ailment, allowing health care workers to make a quicker, more accurate diagnosis.

A team-based approach to health care could potentially catch and prevent more medication errors by ensuring better communication among family doctors, specialists, hospitals, pharmacists, and patients.

Derek Jorgensen is a pharmacist working in an interprofessional team at the West Winds Primary Health Centre in Saskatoon. He explains what can happen if patients aren’t given proper instructions about their medications.

“If a patient goes into hospital for an angiogram, they might be put on two or three new medications,” he says. “But once they are discharged, it’s intended that they stop those new medications and resume their old regimen. But it’s very common for some folks to go home and take both medications – the old and the new – because no one told them what to do.”

Preventing such missteps would not only enhance a patient’s health, but also save the cost of treating problems that can result from poor communication.

In addition, a pharmacist is likely to be up-to-date on the latest developments in drug research, and so be able to flag for the patient when a new medication is more expensive, but no more effective, than an existing drug on the market.

What do you think?

1) Would you feel comfortable if your medical and prescription history was in a central database and available to all of your health care providers?

2) Why are we slow in adopting systems like PharmaNet across Canada?

3) If you work in health care, what impact would adopting a system like PharmaNet have on your work? On your patients or clients?

For more information:

· Watch videos from the Health Council of Canada

o Improving quality and efficiency through technology (BC’s PharmaNet) 

o Improved safety through on-line prescribing (long-term care in Toronto)

 

· Learn more from the Health Council of Canada’s paper Value for Money: Making Canadian Health Care Stronger. See “Take with caution – prescription drugs and the elderly,” p. 32 and “Ways to save on the common cold,” p. 37.

Read The National Pharmaceuticals Strategy: A Prescription Unfilled — a Status Report and Commentary from the Health Council of Canada.


Your responses
central data base
JP
Posted: 2009-03-08 19:55:09

It seems to me that the best way to go is to establish a central data base so that all health care providers can go into a patient's file to quickly access drugs information i.e. drugs that the patient has reacted to, and also to look up what the patient currently takes so as to better advise them on meds that should not be taken together.
Analyst
Paul Cosgrove
Posted: 2009-02-25 13:08:55

This of this state of affairs in very simple terms. Lets's imagine a schoolyard full of kids. We assign 10 kids to be doctors (prescribing dangerious drugs), 10 to be pharmacists (giving these drugs out), and the rest are just running around trying to get healthy. With all those doctors and all those pharmacists, how in the world do you think they will be able to keep track of what was given to who and when. Does this situation inspire a lot of confidence? NOPE. Well basically that is what is going on in most parts of Canada. There neeeeeeds to be a central database across Canada - if not Canada wide at least provincial. All Sample drugs and following prescriptions should go through pharmacy and housed in a database. It is the best way to monitor patient profiles.

I work as an analyst and I see the need for these measures in order to ensure patient safty!

Good luck to the future.

BC Pharmanet comment
charris
Posted: 2009-02-25 09:37:51

I'm a hospital pharmacist in BC and have had access to the Pharmanet for the past 12 years. It is a really useful tool, not just in the emergency department but elsewhere in the hospital. Our pharmacists regularly meet with patients now pre-surgery and using current information from the patient plus the pharmanet profile, all the pt's current medications can be accurately documented. For my patients we can assess for drug over-use and habituation that often complicates a complex situation. It's easy for the pharmacists to confirm the correct dose of a home medication when the patient is unsure. There are ethical guidelines involved, we do have to document when we've looked at a profile and why, and this is monitored closely. The benefits of this system far outweigh risks. Patients can request to view their own profiles or have them printed out. Pharmacists in the community can spot duplications, interactions, over or under-use of necessary medications, and multi-doctoring. That's just the view from the ground-level, at the administrative level it is an amazing tool as well for looking at use of drugs by class, trending, costs etc., again this is bound by ethical guidelines. I'd highly recommend that other provinces adopt this system if they haven't already.
Some Suggestions
PEI
Posted: 2009-02-24 12:57:15

  1. Provide Medical school scholarships to students (Canadian and recruitments from abroad) that will practice in rural areas of Canada for at least 10 years.
  2. Get more paramedics and nurse practitioners in the system to challenge the doctors
  3. Train doctors in the use of computers
  4. Get malpractice lawyers registered and controlled.
  5. Get  Canadian Medical Association and drug company lobbyists out of Ottawa
  6. Get the drug company's influence on doctors under control
  7. Make the federal government responsible for standardizing health care across Province.
  8. Make it perfectly clear to all Provincial Governments  that the privatization of health care in Canada is not an option
more reason for e-records
James J. Carty
Posted: 2009-02-23 12:47:20

This is simply another application of e-records. If all health care providers. including Pharmacists, are on the same system, errors can be greatly reduced.

The way health care is provided to most of us, it is a team approach. Some are fortunate to have have a family doctor to act as the team leader, others do not. In addition, we may also be seeing specialists, all of whom prescribe. When we do get a prescription, we may go to different pharmacies in the name of convenience, there seems to be one on every corner these days.

All this means that there are simply too many instances where there is no central point of control or accountability. Unless doctors and pharmacists are able to see everything that is going on, disaster is simply waiting for the correct circumstances. Without complete and accurate records of all activity, when something does go wrong, the search for a solution can take too long. Without complete knowledge of what they are treating and what other things are going on, all the knowledge that a doctor or pharmacist may have is reduced to the level of a best guess. We deserve much more.
Let Pharmacists write prescriptions
DWickett
Posted: 2009-02-23 09:53:17

Pharmacists go to school for at least four years to get their degrees.  All of their courses focus on drugs and chemestry.  Doctors take a couple of classes a year - so although they would be the ones to diagnose and prescribe your medications, Pharmacists should be allowed to continue (repeat) prescriptions (in conjunction with the software that warns of interactions).  I have to see my doctor every three months to get prescription repeats.  There is no reason for these visits except that I need refills.  If a doctor changes what I take, the pharmacist would see that and tell me if I should stop the old medication or continue it.  Most people get their Rx filled at the same drug store every time so the pharmacist could also inquire if patients don't refill on time or regularily.  The pharmacist is much closer to the patient and it doesn't cost the health care system to speak to your pharmacist.